Product related publication

A novel B-vHIT classification framework enhances discrimination of non-peripheral vs. peripheral vertigo

Fei Li, Jiaodan Yu, Rui Gao, Jianhua Zhuang, Wenyan Li
ENT Discovery
2025
Background

This study aimed to investigate the potential role of binocular video head impulse test (B-vHIT) in distinguishing non-peripheral and peripheral vertigo.


Methods

A cohort of 46 healthy volunteers underwent B-vHIT to establish normative reference values. Concurrently, 104 patients presenting with acute vertigo (onset ≤ 72 hours) underwent B-vHIT and HINTS protocol. B-vHIT parameters were analyzed according to imaging-supported clinical diagnoses and compared with HINTS results. Further, a four-category framework was proposed to differentiate non-peripheral from peripheral vertigo.


Results

Significant differences in Interocular Gain Asymmetry (χ(2) = 68.381, P < 0.001) and Interocular Gain Difference (χ(2) = 50.187, P < 0.001) were observed among groups, revealing a post-hoc hierarchical pattern in which peripheral ophthalmoplegic-related dizziness (POD) group had the highest values, followed by central vertigo, peripheral vertigo and healthy controls. An Asymmetry threshold of < 16 combined with a Difference threshold of < 0.2 achieved 86.4% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity in distinguishing non-peripheral from peripheral causes of vertigo. The Type I (Gain−, Difference−) and Type IV (Gain+, Difference+) patterns demonstrated high specificity (99%) and sensitivity (79%) for identifying non-peripheral vertigo.


Conclusion

The B-vHIT can serve as a useful tool to distinguish between two types vertigo. The classification framework integrating Gain and Difference should be further investigated for distinguishing non-peripheral vertigo from peripheral vertigo.


  • Name
  • Email *
  • Phone
  • I agree to receive email updates and marketing communications from ZEHNlT about products, events, and services. l can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Policies